first commit

extern/STLport/5.2.1/test/compiler/StTerm-order/stterm-test.cc

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+/*
+ * The conversation with Matti Rintala on STLport forum 2005-08-24:
+ *
+ * Do you mean ISO/IEC 14882 3.6.3 [basic.start.term]?
+ *
+ * Yes. "Destructors (12.4) for initialized objects of static storage duration
+ * (declared at block scope or at namespace scope) are called as a result
+ * of returning from main and as a result of calling exit (18.3). These objects
+ * are destroyed in the reverse order of the completion of their constructor
+ * or of the completion of their dynamic initialization."
+ *
+ * I found a confirmation on the web that gcc may not strictly conform
+ * to this behaviour in certains cases unless -fuse-cxa-atexit is used.
+ *
+ * Test below give (without -fuse-cxa-atexit)
+
+Init::Init()
+Init::use_it
+It ctor done    <-- 0
+Init::use_it done
+Init ctor done  <-- 1
+Init2 ctor done <-- 2
+It dtor done    <-- 0
+Init2 dtor done <-- 2
+Init dtor done  <-- 1
+
+
+ * but should:
+
+Init::Init()
+Init::use_it
+It ctor done    <-- 0
+Init::use_it done
+Init ctor done  <-- 1
+Init2 ctor done <-- 2
+Init2 dtor done <-- 2
+Init dtor done  <-- 1
+It dtor done    <-- 0
+
+
+ */
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+using namespace std;
+
+class Init
+{
+  public:
+    Init();
+    ~Init();
+
+    static void use_it();
+};
+
+class Init2
+{
+  public:
+    Init2();
+    ~Init2();
+
+};
+
+static Init init;
+static Init2 init2;
+
+class It
+{
+  public:
+    It();
+    ~It();
+};
+
+Init::Init()
+{
+  printf( "Init::Init()\n" );
+  use_it();
+  printf( "Init ctor done\n" );
+}
+
+Init::~Init()
+{
+  printf( "Init dtor done\n" );
+}
+
+void Init::use_it()
+{
+  printf( "Init::use_it\n" );
+
+  static It it;
+
+  printf( "Init::use_it done\n" );
+}
+
+Init2::Init2()
+{
+  printf( "Init2 ctor done\n" );
+}
+
+Init2::~Init2()
+{
+  printf( "Init2 dtor done\n" );
+}
+
+It::It()
+{
+  printf( "It ctor done\n" );
+}
+
+It::~It()
+{
+  printf( "It dtor done\n" );
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+  return 0;
+}